1972 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 396 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 540 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-4 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-4 | Helem |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |
