1972 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda RX-4 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-4 | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | RX-4 | eK |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2350 mm |
