1972 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-4 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | RX-4 | XF |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2908 mm |