1972 McLaren M19 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 McLaren M19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 McLaren M19 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 McLaren M19 (444 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 McLaren M19 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1972 McLaren M19.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 McLaren M19 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | McLaren | Renault |
| Model | M19 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
