1972 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,746 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 611 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mercedes-Benz E | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Saab |
Model | E | 92 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2746 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |