1972 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1958 Rover P4
To start off, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1958 Rover P4. (70 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1958 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Rover P4 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mercedes-Benz E (159 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Rover P4. (153 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1972 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mercedes-Benz E | 1958 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | E | P4 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |