1972 Mercury Comet vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 310 kg more than 1972 Mercury Comet.
Because 1972 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mercury Comet (178 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 1972 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mercury Comet | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Comet | Almera |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2780 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 138 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2540 mm |