1972 Mercury Comet vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1972 Mercury Comet. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercury Comet.
Because 1972 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mercury Comet (178 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1972 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mercury Comet | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Comet | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2780 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2685 mm |
