1972 Mini Clubman vs. 1963 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1972 Mini Clubman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,147 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Spitfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Spitfire weights approximately 55 kg more than 1972 Mini Clubman.
Because 1963 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mini Clubman | 1963 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Mini | Triumph |
Model | Clubman | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2110 mm |