1972 Mini MK III vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1972 Mini MK III is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1972 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1972 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mini MK III weights approximately 190 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mini MK III | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Mini | Simca |
| Model | MK III | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2250 mm |
