1972 Mini MK III vs. 1982 Volvo 260

To start off, 1982 Volvo 260 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 260 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1972 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1972 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 260 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mini MK III.

Compare all specifications: