1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | Colt | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2430 mm |
