1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado would be higher. At 6,966 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Colt | Toronado |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6966 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3030 mm |
