1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 1300 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (102 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Colt | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1296 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2460 mm |
