1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Colt | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6750 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3060 mm |