1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 45 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Colt | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1488 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2420 mm |
