1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Chevrolet Alero
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Alero is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Alero (140 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Alero should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Alero weights approximately 460 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Alero (199 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Chevrolet Alero | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Colt | Alero |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2392 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 199 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2730 mm |