1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 403 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
| Model | Colt | CSX |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
