1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Colt | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2640 mm |
