1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 286 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
Model | Colt | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1500 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2436 mm |