1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Kia Forte
To start off, 2012 Kia Forte is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Forte weights approximately 378 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Kia Forte | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
Model | Colt | Forte |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1288 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2649 mm |