1972 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 961 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Mitsubishi Colt 2013 Jaguar XJ
Make Mitsubishi Jaguar
Model Colt XJ
Year Released 1972 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 2995 cc
Horse Power 72 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 120 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Front AWD
Vehicle Weight 910 kg 1871 kg
Vehicle Length 4000 mm 5127 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 2105 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3032 mm