1972 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1972 Mitsubishi Minica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mitsubishi Minica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mitsubishi Minica | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Minica | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 359 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3010 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |