1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 1963 Volvo 120
To start off, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 1963 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | 120 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 58 L |