1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1971 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Monteverdi | ZAZ |
Model | 2000 | 966 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2170 mm |