1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1983 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Monteverdi | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2420 mm |