1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 385 kg more than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |
