1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 250 kg more than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Monteverdi | Audi |
Model | 2000 | TT |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1351 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |