1972 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Monteverdi 2000 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
| Model | 2000 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |
