1972 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue

To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1972 Morgan 4. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1972 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 861 kg more than 1972 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Morgan 4. (135 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Morgan 4.

Compare all specifications: