1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 1972 Nissan 240 C is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1972 Nissan 240 C (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Nissan 240 C should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 725 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan 240 C (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan 240 C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | 240 C | 600 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |