1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 1960 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1972 Nissan 240 C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 315 kg more than 1960 Volvo P 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Nissan 240 C | 1960 Volvo P 1800 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | 240 C | P 1800 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
