1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 115 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1972 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1972 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | 240 C | CR-V |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |