1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1972 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1972 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | 240 C | TL |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |