1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2001 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Octavia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 65 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2001 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | 240 C | Octavia |
Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |