1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1972 Nissan 240 C. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan 240 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 160 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan 240 C. (200 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | 240 C | 350Z |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |