1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 151 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | 240 C | Polo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1109 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |