1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 240 C | C70 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |