1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Kuga weights approximately 155 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | 240 C | Kuga |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |