1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 91 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1972 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1972 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | 240 C | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2703 mm |