1972 Nissan 240 C vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 578 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1972 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1972 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan 240 C | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | 240 C | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2875 mm |