1972 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1986 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1986 Seat Ronda is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,428 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Nissan Bluebird (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1986 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 30 kg more than 1986 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan Bluebird | 1986 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Bluebird | Ronda |
Year Released | 1972 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1428 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2460 mm |