1972 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Bluebird.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Bluebird | 3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1428 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2639 mm |