1972 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1264 kg more than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC90 (440 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | XC90 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1428 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5850 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2860 mm |