1972 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Kia Forte
To start off, 2009 Kia Forte is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 92 kg more than 2009 Kia Forte.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Forte. (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Forte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Cedric | Forte |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1228 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4529 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2649 mm |
