1972 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1966 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 NSU Ro 80 | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | NSU | Plymouth |
| Model | Ro 80 | Valiant |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 2789 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
