1972 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1970 Zastava 2101

To start off, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1970 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 2101. 1972 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1970 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1970 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: