1972 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400. 1972 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: