1972 NSU Ro 80 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1972 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1972 NSU Ro 80 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | NSU | Ford |
Model | Ro 80 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 132 L |