1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 1146 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Cutlass | 4 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7462 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |
